Prostate cancer is a leading killer
of men in North America, second only to heart disease. Proliferation and
metastatic progression of prostate cancer is sensitive to the steroidal hormones
testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, the principal endogenous ligands of the
androgen receptor. For this reason, androgen deprivation is the standard
first-line therapy used to treat the initial stages of the disease. This therapeutic
regimen involves a reduction of androgen hormones using pharmaceuticals or
surgery in order to prevent prostate cancer cells from growing. In response to
low levels of testosterone, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) is
produced in the hypothalamus, which activates the synthesis of luteinizing hormone
(LH) by the pituitary gland. LH then travels to the testicles, where it induces the production
of testosterone. LHRH agonists and antagonists both inhibit the formation of LH
in the pituitary gland and thereby lower the amount of testosterone that is made
by the testicles. Reduction of androgens using drug therapy as opposed to surgery
is sometimes referred to as ‘chemical castration.’
Unfortunately, the recurrence of androgen-insensitive or ‘castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)’ is often observed in patients. Current treatments for CRPC employ radiopharmaceutical, immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic approaches. Among the frontline chemotherapeutic agents for CRPC is a steroidal antiandrogen marketed under the trade name Zytiga. Zytiga (abiraterone) is an androgen synthesis inhibitor that is used in combination with another steroid, prednisone. The anticancer drug inhibits cytochrome P450 subtype 17A1 (CYP17A1), an enzyme with both 17a-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activities, which plays a critical role in the steroidogenic pathway that produces endogenous androgen hormones. Biosynthetically, CYP17A1 catalyzes the C17a-hydroxylation of pregnenolone and progesterone (see Figure above) and also acts upon those hydroxylated metabolites to excise the side-chain from the steroid nucleus (the lyase activity), furnishing the intact androgen receptor ligands. Inhibition of CYP17A1 by Zytiga effectively decreases circulating levels of androgens such as DHEA, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone. Zytiga also acts as an antagonist of the androgen receptor and as an inhibitor of the enzyme 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3b-HSD), further reinforcing its efficacy as an antiandrogenic treatment for metastatic CRPC. Zytiga therapy generally prolongs survival by 4.6 months when compared to placebo but durable responses are not always observed, presumably due to acquired resistance. Therefore, new therapeutic intervention strategies for resistant PC with an androgen-depletion-independent phenotype are sought.
Unfortunately, the recurrence of androgen-insensitive or ‘castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)’ is often observed in patients. Current treatments for CRPC employ radiopharmaceutical, immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic approaches. Among the frontline chemotherapeutic agents for CRPC is a steroidal antiandrogen marketed under the trade name Zytiga. Zytiga (abiraterone) is an androgen synthesis inhibitor that is used in combination with another steroid, prednisone. The anticancer drug inhibits cytochrome P450 subtype 17A1 (CYP17A1), an enzyme with both 17a-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activities, which plays a critical role in the steroidogenic pathway that produces endogenous androgen hormones. Biosynthetically, CYP17A1 catalyzes the C17a-hydroxylation of pregnenolone and progesterone (see Figure above) and also acts upon those hydroxylated metabolites to excise the side-chain from the steroid nucleus (the lyase activity), furnishing the intact androgen receptor ligands. Inhibition of CYP17A1 by Zytiga effectively decreases circulating levels of androgens such as DHEA, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone. Zytiga also acts as an antagonist of the androgen receptor and as an inhibitor of the enzyme 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3b-HSD), further reinforcing its efficacy as an antiandrogenic treatment for metastatic CRPC. Zytiga therapy generally prolongs survival by 4.6 months when compared to placebo but durable responses are not always observed, presumably due to acquired resistance. Therefore, new therapeutic intervention strategies for resistant PC with an androgen-depletion-independent phenotype are sought.
A team of natural products
scientists at the University of Arizona and the spin-out company NuvoGen Research (Tuscon) has recently developed a unique high-throughput screening
(HTS) approach that utilizes a gene expression profiling methodology. They
refer to the technique as the ‘ArrayPlate’ gene signature assay and it has
enabled the research team to evaluate large libraries of natural product
extracts derived from local Sonoran desert plants to identify chemical agents
that could effectively reverse the androgen receptor (AR) gene signature to its
inactive state. They have utilized the ArrayPlate technology to analyze 18,000
samples and have recently disclosed the exciting results in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. Of all
the samples tested, the most active was an extract derived from the flowering
plant Physalis crassifolia (depicted
above). The extract blocked androgen-induced expression of the gene encoding
for prostate-specific antigen (or PSA), as well as others. Bioactivity-guided
fractionation of the P. crassifolia
extract led to the identification of molecules from a specific subclass of
withanolide-type steroids, the 17b-hydroxywithanolides.
These, like the classical withanolides, are ergostane-based steroidal lactones.
But unlike the majority of the over 600 natural withanolides characterized to date,
17b-hydroxywithanolides possess an a-oriented C17 side chain appended to the
steroid D-ring. Additionally, the side chain attachment position (C17) of all
of the active compounds is hydroxylated in the b-configuration.
The most active and chemically stable inhibitor of androgen-induced genes was a
semisynthetic 17b-hydroxywithanolide derivative
that was later shown to be structurally identical to the natural product
physachenolide C (structure shown above). Physachenolides C and D displayed nanomolar
cytotoxic potency against a panel of human cancer cell lines with a high degree
of selectivity over normal human foreskin fibroblast cells. The molecules were
effective against androgen-sensitive LNCaP cancer cells, as well as the androgen-insensitive PC-3 cell line.
Given the steroidal nature of the active compounds, it was essential to show
that the cytotoxic biological responses (or lack thereof) were not due to
modulatory androgen receptor activity. It was confirmed that physachenolide D
had no effect on androgen binding to the AR, while dihydrotestosterone
inhibited binding with an IC50 of 13 nM.
Adapted from: R. M. Kris, A. A. L. Gunatilaka and co-workers. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 6984. |
Prior to in vivo efficacy evaluation
of physachenolide C, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined and then pharmacokinetic
studies were conducted using variously formulated drug substance dosed via
intraperitoneal (IP), gastric gavage (GG) and subcutaneous (SC) routes of
administration. Ultimately, it was determined that efficacy studies could be
conducted optimally using the SC route with ‘Trappsol,’ a formulation excipient
recommended for administering hydrophobic compounds and approved by the FDA for
injection into humans, as the vehicle. Two human PC murine xenograft models
were conducted: the first mimicked an androgen-dependent disease using mouse inoculation
with cancerous LNCaP cells and the second was an androgen-independent model
using PC-3 cells. The results from the LNCaP xenograft experiment (reproduced
above from J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 6984.) showed that physachenolide C was able to reduce tumor
growth in a dose-dependent manner but did not invoke a synergistic effect when
applied in combination with Taxotere®, which is the current standard of care
for CRPC. A similar level of efficacy was observed in the androgen-independent PC-3
xenograft model. As is often the case with cytotoxic agents, the therapeutic safety
window is a key parameter. As the authors put it: “…[compound] 6 was able to reduce tumor growth…in
the mice that did not die from the toxicity.” Indeed, at a dose of 25 mg/kg physachenolide
C, three of the eight mice died due to drug toxicity (Figure above, lower panel). At 25 mg/kg
physachenolide C, dosed in combination with Taxotere®, all eight of the mice
succumbed. All other deaths observed in the course of the study were due to
euthanization because of tumor size. The authors speculate on a potential
mechanism of action for the observed potent and selective anti-PC activity
involving TRAIL-induced apoptosis of carcinoma cells.
Thanks for sharing this great article. Great information thanks a lot for the detailed article, That is very interesting I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this. I am very happy to your post about on. Great information, I would like to say your post is very informative.
ReplyDeleteGene assay